Tuesday, December 8, 2020

This suit may have some traction!

Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules

JOEL B. POLLAK7 Dec 2020952

The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through

the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.

Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:

Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.

This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.


Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.

6 comments:

  1. How can Texas can complain about other states? What about states' rights? Σ(ಠ_ಠ)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12/08/2020

      States have rights, lawful rights. The lawful rights are passed by the state legislature. The violation of the creating of unlawful policy affected ALL states that followed state legislation under the constitution.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12/08/2020

      That is a good question. I just read that the Constitution does allow for disputes between states to be handled by the Supreme Ct. I am not sure what their exact dispute is, maybe it is that the other states are certifying their Electors as a result of voter fraud and therefore denying Texas and it's citizens a fair national election. We will see.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous12/08/2020

    When the Democrats can't get their way, they go through the courts. Kinda like Covid 19 and emergency powers in this state. These laws need to go through the State legislature.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Supposedly, the Electoral College was designed to eliminate these conflicts. I guess not. ⊙﹏⊙

    Not being a Federalist country that much and allowing 50 states to run presidential elections as they see fit would cause problems eventuality. (@_@)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous12/09/2020

    We know how Judas Robert's is going to vote! How was he able to adopt Irish children in Latin America? Just like the deep state will keep Hunter's laptop over Biden's head. Trump will concede when he is guaranteed no prosecutions for him and his family.

    ReplyDelete