The members of this "union" have consistently neglected the needs of the children. Their acts, including this strike, are motivated solely by self-interest. An interest in not going to work. An interest in not giving it your all. With a work ethic like that, one can imagine the quality they are cranking out.
Now is the time for Mayor Lightfoot to step forward and show leadership. It is time to break this loose confederation of public servants called "teachers", a significant % of whom live in the suburbs. How? Stop talking. Stop talking. They are using your non-stop talking as a stall tactic. Fire them. It's that simple. Give them a set time and date. After that date, those who have not returned to work, will be subject to a certain % salary cut. That % will increase every few days in increments of five and will be set in stone. It won't take long to reopen the schools as most of the "teachers" live hand to mouth.
This is the mayor's chance to shine. She needs to either do it or get out.
CHICAGO (CBS) — With classes canceled again on Monday, the battle continues between Mayor Lori Lightfoot and the Chicago Teachers Union on getting students back to school.
CTU has outlined a proposal to get staff back
in the building safely and students learning remotely and eventually back in schools.The CTU wants to reaffirm the metrics from the last round, emphasizing the advantages of regular testing for not only staff but all students, that if you are exposed, you can come back to the school more quickly.
And before they could even finish their press conference, the mayor fired back shooting down their proposal.
The CTU says it had a meeting with the house of delegates, authorizing them to make a comprehensive proposal, which would restart structure, give parents clarity and give a clear date to restart the education process. Its proposal includes enrolling as many students in a screening test program on a weekly basis, across schools in the district.
Staff would be back in the building and students would stay remote, pushing to get remote learning up by late next week. They would get devices out, start testing and start remote instruction on Wednesday, Jan. 12.
CTU suggests members to participate in school building level in contact tracing for student cases, pointing out that parents have made it known they haven’t been notified quickly in the past.
“Why don’t we get devices out, get the kids signed up for testing and start remote instruction on Wednesday. That’s apart of our proposal,” said CTU Chief of Staff Jennifer Johnson.
CTU is also asking for high quality masks for not only staff but students as well. CTU says this has been extremely frustrating and they need the mayor’s office to meet them halfway.
Mayor Lori Lightfoot has already made it clear she’s against two things: any kind of across the board testing and any remote learning.
CTU says it is aware, but they say that doesn’t make sense. They’re offering compromise in one of those areas.
The mayor’s response is students need to be back in person as soon as possible and they will not relent.
Chicago Public Schools responded in a press release, saying Saturday afternoon it received the CTU’s propsal “toward ending their illegal strike.”
“We recognize we are growing closer on many important issues,” the release stated. “We’re confident that continued negotiations will support the return to in-person learning next week. Students need to be back in their schools, where it’s safe, as soon as possible. That’s what parents want. That’s what the science supports.”CPS released a list of responses to the CTU’s proposal. Among other things, CPS agreed to provide K95 masks for students and staff, reinstate health screeners required on a school by school basis, and to continue to provide weekly COVID-19 testing for all students and staff.
Proposals CPS rejected include remote learning beginning Jan. 12 and in-person learning Jan. 18. CPS wrote, “CPS is firm that both staff and students should return for in-person teaching and learning as soon as possible. Science supports that the safest place for students is in school.”
CPS also rejected the CTU’s proposal for district wide remote learning, saying, “CPS is not authorized under state law to satisfy the Union’s demand for District-wide remote learning. Remote learning days across an entire district cannot be counted as instructional days.”
CPS also said it stands firm that staff who did not work during this period will not be paid
The proposal was sent to CTU Saturday evening, CPS said.
If a Genie came down and would grant you only 1 wish and that wish is you could have anyone a Mayor of Chicago in 2023 who would it be. Must be a living person.
ReplyDeleteThere wasnt a one I liked in 2019.
The way things are in Chicago, disappearing tax base, increased fees and cost of living, being able to handpick the next mayor would be the equivalent of crowning the next winner of an ugly contest. I'd go through a process of elimination. No Lightfoot, or anyone linked to Obama. That still leaves plenty of people to choose from...oh yeah and nobody related to Rich Daley.
DeleteVouchers
ReplyDeleteI'm amazed that we can't divide kids ip and send them to all local firehouses. Good food, beds, and couches.
ReplyDeleteNot a bad mayor, Just too many other minority office holders to make perfect storm
ReplyDeleteMajority of these so called teachers live in the burbs. I would fire them all if they didnt report to work, The public is sick of these lazy assholes, she would have public sentiment on her side if she did, but she wont cause she still wants to make a deal with the, You cant fix stupid with this 1.
ReplyDeleteExcellent column. Somebody should email it to this idiot mayor. How many toimes has the CTU made her look like an idiot? Now is the time to get tough on CTU and crime. But she is too stupid to figure that move out.
ReplyDeleteWhy can't city open firehouses to cps school kids. Kids can get good meals and nap time
ReplyDeleteMayor should utilize cfd to sit in classroom and read to kids and tell interesting fire stores.
DeleteWhat are the teachers asking for specifically??
ReplyDelete