Whatever he said to her is a secret!

Cook County Judge Raul Vega accused of making comment that ‘likely’ violated conduct code

He was put on administrative duty and replaced as presiding judge of the domestic violence division after being accused of making the comment to another judge. What Vega said hasn’t been revealed. 

By Matthew Hendrickson@MHendricksonCST  Dec 29, 2021, 3:03pm CST

Share this storShare this on Facebook (opens in new windoShare this on Twitter (opens in new window)

• All sharing options

Retiring Judge Raul Vega, formerly the presiding judge of the county’s domestic violence division, allegedly made a statement to another judge on Dec. 6 that would violate the state’s judicial code of conduct. 

Adobe Stock Photo

A Cook County judge who was recently replaced as the presiding judge of the domestic violence division has been

reassigned to administrative duties because of a comment he allegedly made to a colleague.

Chief Judge Tim Evans’ office did not give details as to what Judge Raul Vega said to another judge on Dec. 6 but said the comment “would likely” have violated the state’s code of judicial conduct.

A domestic violence courthouse employee who answered a phone call from the Chicago Sun-Times Wednesday said Vega left on vacation last week and wasn’t likely reachable for comment. 

Vega’s upcoming retirement was announced last week as was the appointment of Judge Judith Rice as acting presiding judge of the domestic violence courthouse. 

Vega was reassigned to “restricted duties or duties other than judicial duties ...” Evans said. 

The Cook County circuit court’s executive committee, which composed of Evans and other presiding judges, made the decision to inform the state’s Judicial Inquiry Board of Vega’s alleged comment, Evans said earlier this week. 

But details about Vega’s alleged misconduct likely won’t surface.

Vega is retiring in January, and the board loses its jurisdiction to investigate judges upon their retirement, according to Michael Deno, the board’s executive director.

Allegations received by the board are investigated and only released publicly if the matter is further referred to the Illinois Courts Commission — an independent judicial body that could ultimately make a finding to remove, suspend or reprimand a judge. 

Until a matter is referred to the commission, the state Constitution mandates all allegations are kept “strictly confidential,” Deno said, adding that he could neither confirm nor deny whether the board had received Evans’ referral about Vega.