 |
| is the mayor afraid of Mexicans? why? she needs to be the mayor for all Chicagoans |
While praising improvements in the area, the mayor said that 10 years ago, Pilsen was “a neighborhood we all would have been a little bit concerned about being in after dark.”
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/66451226/PILSEN_07XX18_1.0.jpg)
Looking west on 18th Street in Chicago’s Pilsen neighborhood. Sun-Times file
Mayor Lori Lightfoot on Thursday risked insulting Pilsen residents with remarks intended to praise its resurgence.
“Pilsen 10 years ago was a neighborhood we all would have been a little bit concerned about being in after dark,” the mayor said.
“Pilsen now is a vibrant, thriving neighborhood. What’s the difference? The difference is economic development.”
Lightfoot’s remarks came during a question-and-answer session at a daylong “Innovation Summit” as she discussed reducing gun violence by creating “vibrant, healthy and safe neighborhoods.”
Rookie Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez (25th) branded the mayor’s remarks about Pilsen “insulting” and said they showed how “disconnected” she is from problems posed by the gentrification that has “eroded” the neighborhood’s cultural identity.
Pilsen’s strong Mexican-American community is “internationally-renowned” for its “culture, murals, festivals, restaurants and people.”
But, he added: “We still have small businesses struggling and empty storefronts. We still have homeowners, especially the most vulnerable, struggling to pay their property taxes. … We have a community that is still the victim of violence,” he said.
“To say this community is just thriving without acknowledging that we have many challenges ahead of us … shows an administration disconnected from the reality of our community. Thriving for whom? We still see the most vulnerable being left out. The marginalized being left out of the conversation.”
Sigcho-Lopez added, “We’re still waiting for a true partnership that stands up to the big developers. That stands up to the corporate interests that continues to try and buy their way into the community.”
Lightfoot’s office declined to respond to the alderman’s comments.
The mayor also had mentioned River North, but not in quite the same way.
“Not that long ago, River North was an area you drove quickly through to get on expressways to take yourself someplace else. What’s the difference? Intentional economic development,” Lightfoot said.
“That kind of intentionality is what we are bringing to areas like Austin, North Lawndale, West Garfield Park, Englewood, the Far South Side.”
Mayor Lori Lightfoot on Thursday risked insulting Pilsen residents with remarks intended to praise its resurgence.
“Pilsen 10 years ago was a neighborhood we all would have been a little bit concerned about being in after dark,” the mayor said.
“Pilsen now is a vibrant, thriving neighborhood. What’s the difference? The difference is economic development.”
Lightfoot’s remarks came during a question-and-answer session at a daylong “Innovation Summit” as she discussed reducing gun violence by creating “vibrant, healthy and safe neighborhoods.”
Rookie Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez (25th) branded the mayor’s remarks about Pilsen “insulting” and said they showed how “disconnected” she is from problems posed by the gentrification that has “eroded” the neighborhood’s cultural identity.
Pilsen’s strong Mexican-American community is “internationally-renowned” for its “culture, murals, festivals, restaurants and people.”
But, he added: “We still have small businesses struggling and empty storefronts. We still have homeowners, especially the most vulnerable, struggling to pay their property taxes. … We have a community that is still the victim of violence,” he said.
“To say this community is just thriving without acknowledging that we have many challenges ahead of us … shows an administration disconnected from the reality of our community. Thriving for whom? We still see the most vulnerable being left out. The marginalized being left out of the conversation.”
Sigcho-Lopez added, “We’re still waiting for a true partnership that stands up to the big developers. That stands up to the corporate interests that continues to try and buy their way into the community.”
Lightfoot’s office declined to respond to the alderman’s comments.
The mayor also had mentioned River North, but not in quite the same way.
“Not that long ago, River North was an area you drove quickly through to get on expressways to take yourself someplace else. What’s the difference? Intentional economic development,” Lightfoot said.
“That kind of intentionality is what we are bringing to areas like Austin, North Lawndale, West Garfield Park, Englewood, the Far South Side.”
I love how the Mexicans in Pilsen are screaming about gentrification as if they own the place. I was born in Pilsen,specifically "the heart of Chicago' No one came to our aid when we were run out of the neighborhood by the robbing, drugging horde of Mexicans who moved in in the early 60s. We moved after my younger brother got robbed at knife point helping me sell Cub Scout candy. And don't kid yourself, the Latin Kings still hold sway on those streets
ReplyDeleteWTF? She's right. Pilsen was a gang roach infested shithole 10 years ago. The murders there were insane. It's better now. What an upside down world we live in. Maybe the people will feel better if we do some drive-bys.
ReplyDeletePilsen is majority Mexican. Edison Park is majority White. Englewood is majority Black.
ReplyDeleteThe criminals of those above named neighborhoods usually reflect the composition of those neighborhoods. It's a fact not racism.
I don't see too many criminals in Edison Park. How many shootings have they had?
DeleteHow many Murders in Edison Park?
DeleteStill is and we all know why.....
ReplyDeleteThe Local Alderman is a police hating communist, trying to infringe upon the rights of property owners to sell.
ReplyDelete