Saturday, July 13, 2019

What was the problem?

Commander Edward Wodnicki

Chicago police official reassigned after speeding incident in Indiana

Posted Jul 12 2019 07:18PM CDT

CHICAGO (AP) - A Chicago police commander has been reassigned amid allegations he drove at speeds of more than 100 mph while being pursued by Indiana state authorities.

The Chicago Tribune reports Friday Cmdr. Edward Wodnicki was reassigned to administrative duty. Department spokesman Anthony Guglielmi says an internal investigation is underway into the June 12 incident near Chesterton, Indiana, about 45 miles from Chicago.

The Associated Press couldn't reach Wodnicki for comment.

Indiana police say Wodnicki was observed speeding on Interstate 94 in an unmarked car with blue lights flashing. A trooper says Wodnicki initially failed to stop, but did so before driving over spike strips deployed by troopers. He was ticketed for driving 80 mph (129 kmh) in a 70 mph (113 kmh) zone.

Wodnicki, commander of a detective division, oversaw the investigation into "Empire" actor Jussie Smollett.

8 comments:

  1. His clout will protect him. Bosses never face real discipline.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous7/13/2019

    "He was ticketed for driving 80 mph (129 kmh) in a 70 mph (113 kmh) zone."


    So his CHINAMAN already cut a deal with Indiana State Police.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7/13/2019

    Dude had a good head of hair back in the day.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7/14/2019

    Indiana doesn’t play, Chicago has a needle exchange program for junkies, in Porter county Indiana possession of a needle gets you felony charges. Nothing we like better than locking up Chicago based criminals, it sends a message, Stay away this ain’t Kim Fox country.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous7/15/2019

    Kinda of runs I the family?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous7/15/2019

    I love the story about how his dad got bounced from the CPD. He was Chief of Detectives and a front runner to become Superintendent.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous7/29/2019

    Thanks for finally writing about >"What was the problem?" <Loved it!

    ReplyDelete