Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Legal problems if allegations stick

WHAT DID HE DO?
President Trump recently tweeted claiming that former President Obama wiretapped him during his campaign. One can only imagine how nuts the media would have gone if the roles had been reversed: President Trump wiretapping either Obama or the Clintons, though his DOJ could have authority to do just that given the expansive leaks of intelligence information by Obama and Clinton supporters the last few months. Heck, he could wiretap the media at this point, legally and legitimately, as the sources of these unlawful leaks, for which Obama himself set precedent. Do liberals understand what Pandora’s Box Obama opened up by Obama using the powers of the NSA, CIA and FBI to spy on his political opponents? Even Nixon never did that.

If the stories are correct, Obama or his officials might even face prosecution. But, we are still early in all of this and there are a lot of rumors flying around so the key is if the reports are accurate. We just don’t know at this time. The stories currently are three-fold: first, that Obama’s team tried to get a warrant from a regular, Article III federal court on Trump, and was told no by someone along the way (maybe the FBI), as the evidence was that weak or non-existent; second, Obama’s team then tried to circumvent the federal judiciary’s independent role by trying to mislabel the issue one of “foreign agents,” and tried to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “courts”, and were again turned down, when the court saw Trump named (an extremely rare act of FISA court refusal of the government, suggesting the evidence was truly non-existent against Trump); and so, third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump. Are these allegations true? We don’t know yet, but if any part of them are then Obama and/or his officials could face serious trouble.

Can a President be charged with a crime? Only once out of office. While in office, impeachment remains the exclusive remedy in order to avoid a single judicial branch trying to overturn an election, such as a grand jury in any part of the country could. Once out of office, a President remains immune from civil liability for his duties while President, under a 1982 decision of the United States Supreme Court. However, as the Nixon pardon attests, nothing forecloses a criminal prosecution of the President after his presidency is complete for crimes against the country. Obama, the Constitutional lawyer that his is, should know that.


What crimes could have been committed? Ironically, for Democrats falsely accusing Attorney General Sessions, perjury and conspiracy to commit perjury, as well as intentional violations of FISA. Rather shockingly, no law currently forbids misusing the power of the presidency to spy on one’s adversaries. What the law does forbid is lying to any judicial officer to obtain any means of surveillance. What the law does forbid, under criminal penalty, is the misuse of FISA. Both derive from the protections of the Fourth Amendment itself. Under section 1809, FISA makes it a crime for anyone to either “engage in” electronic surveillance under “color of law” under FISA without following the law’s restrictions, or “disclose” or “use” information gathered from it in contravention of the statute’s sharp constrictions.

3 comments:

  1. Anonymous3/07/2017

    Plenty of free lancers that worked for FBI,CIA,NSA with the skills to get into any communication system.....cells phones are easy to hack....childs play.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous3/07/2017

    After 8 years of sidestepping the law, this "constitutional law" instructor did nothing but ignore the checks and balances of the constitution. How was it that the Obama administration could ignore a congressional subpoena for former Attorney General Eric Holder and not be held in contempt of Congress. Answer; he didn't give a damn. Those very same things Pelosi and Schumer are screaming about were rampant during Obama's administration. His pardons, his take on Travon Martin, the whole Black Lives matter fiction. This is a narcissist who smiled and basically ignored serious crime within his own administration. The Hillary server and the Clinton Foundation selling out the security of our country...what did he do to stop it? Not a goddamn thing. The YouTube videos about him doing crack and getting blow jobs from Larry what's his name are almost unbelievable.. All you lefties out there better wake up or we won't be leaving much of a country for our kids.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3/07/2017

      Nice summation of 0bama's "legacy."

      Delete