Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Considering the past seven years, why would any Irish / Polish / Italian / Mexican Catholic vote Democratic?

Trump is reviving Reagan Democrats as Ethnic voters re-evaluate what Obama and Liberalism has done for them. 

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump signs autographs at a campaign rally in Concord, North Carolina on Monday, March 7, 2016. 
Mary Renkor approached her 23rd Ward early voting polling place with trepidation Monday in anticipation of doing something she says she had never done.

“I’ve changed my party to Republican,” the 65-year-old retired nurse from Garfield Ridge confided afterward.

“You wouldn’t believe how hard it was to declare. It just seems like treason or something,” explained Renkor, who said she’s “punched straight Democrat my whole life.”

The reason behind Renkor’s switch should be no surprise to anyone following the strange goings-on this election season.

“I’m voting for Trump,” she said.

Yes, Donald Trump, the current favorite for the Republican presidential nomination, has a following in Democratic territory, too.

Renkor cast her ballot at the Clearing Public Library at 63rd Place and Narragansett in the Southwest Side bungalow belt.

Not long ago, this area was ground zero for the political phenomenon known as the Reagan Democrats — conservative, big-city Dems who altered the political dynamic in Illinois and elsewhere through their preference for the Republican president.

Is it possible that Reagan Democrats — or more likely their philosophical descendants — could be reborn in 2016 as Trump Democrats?

I regard that as a frightening possibility — and also a very real one.

While most Democrats have looked on with delight as Trump’s rise has set off a messy internal battle within the Republican Party, I’m struck by a sense of be-careful-what-you-wish-for.

The evidence is mainly anecdotal at this point, with Democratic ward committeemen reporting more Democratic voters than usual requesting Republican primary ballots this year. City election officials report only a slight uptick to 9 percent GOP primary voters from 6 percent in 2008.

Some Democrats may be taking a Republican ballot for the express purpose of voting against Trump, but I doubt there are many, especially in a year with a contested presidential race and other important contests on the ballot.

I’d actually made the drive out to the 23rd Ward to look into a related phenomena — Democratic voters who never really understood the legal requirement to declare their party until they went to vote for Trump. These voters have been caught off guard to learn that in a primary they can’t have their cake and eat it, too, meaning vote for their state and local Democrats and Trump as well.

When that happens, those angry Trump voters have found one more reason to be angry.

“People are mad because they never realized before they couldn’t vote for who they wanted,” said Larry Thomas, a poll watcher for Jason Gonzales, the Democrat trying to unseat House Speaker Mike Madigan.

Thomas, who is stationed outside the Clearing Library, said he’s been amazed at how many voters were unaware there is no ticket-splitting in a primary.

He said he spoke to three or four voters last week who emerged from the polling place to say they had written in Trump’s name on their Democratic ballot. That’s a vote that won’t count, of course, but if you’re making a statement you’re making a statement.

Kyle Schwab, another Gonzales worker, said he also heard a lot of pro-Trump, anti-Hillary Clinton sentiment last week from his sidewalk vantage point.

“It’s a more widely expressed opinion than I would have ever imagined,” he said.

One voter, mistaking Schwab for a Madigan supporter, angrily told him “you guys just lost five votes” after he learned he couldn’t vote for local Democrats plus Trump and stormed out of the polling place.

“Forget it, we’re not voting,” he said of his family, according to Schwab.

Renkor decided to just make the switch, even though it necessitated not being able to vote for Madigan.

“I like Madigan. That’s the only thing that hurts me. I feel bad about him, but sorry,” she said.

In a general election, it only gets easier to abandon the Democrats.

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous3/08/2016

    I agree that he has tapped into a populism that is attractive to many on both sides of the traditional aisle. He basically takes positions that the majority of Americans agree with. Strong defense, calling out terrorism when it blows up right in our faces. Immigration. - telling the truth that we are being scammed by other countries, especially Mexico and telling Vicente Fox he can kiss off. Leaders on both sides have let us down. Trade - he, like many Americans are waking up to the fact that free trade does not mean fair trade...they can come and sell anything here and even undercut our own industries, while the same countries ALREADY have put road blocks up to our goods. These nations already have tariffs, so what we should do is tell them - remove/lower your tariffs/barriers OR we will do the same to you. War - no more trillion dollar - 10,000 dead wars. But there is one big BUT! Trump needs to tone it down significantly. He is really a loose cannon and he must get smarter. If he can do that we have a chance...if he insists on addressing every little slight he receives...then he will lose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3/09/2016

      The Clintons have ALWAYS been about money. It was rumored that the passage of NAFTRA coincided with a venture the folks at Perdue Chicken had in Mexico in which the Clintons were silent partners. The passage of NAFTRA benefited both. That was back when Rahm was up everyone's ass in Washington DC. No pun intended but the chickens really didn't come home to roost, they stayed south of the border. I'm uncertain as to what benefit this trade agreement gave the United States. Likewise the trade agreements with the Pacific Rim countries doesn't appear to be helping much either. It appears all the money is leaving the country and none, or very little, is coming back. Our jobs are disappearing too.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous3/08/2016

    And so It begins.Finally people are starting to wake up.And the Democrat's might have to draft Joe biden to make it a close race.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3/08/2016

    Could there be any clearer illustration of the political elite undermining the wishes of the electorate with former Presidential candidate Mitt Romney exhorting the voting public to vote against Trump. Trump; like him or hate him, its up to the voters, not Romney, or anyone else to tell you how to vote. If you go to the Drudge Report and go to Boston Globe reporter Howie Carr's entries, you'll see that Romney has a history of chumming up to political candidates when its to his advantage and then turn his back on them when its time to reciprocate. That sort of disloyalty really bothers me. Nothing worse in politics than a rat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3/09/2016

      I have to agree, and I was a big fan of Romney until this latest BS. He will now be remembered for this weasel act. People say he and the elites are trying to "stop Trump" but what they really are trying to stop is the voters. P.S. I am actually voting for Cruz....but will support whoever wins....

      Delete
  4. Anonymous3/09/2016

    And how about that Obama, blows of Scolia's funeral, now he's taking a pass on Nancy Reagan's funeral so he can attend a SWSX "festival" in Texas. Its supposed to be a thing for start up companies. What a jag off.

    ReplyDelete